Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
59
Highlights
39
Differences
10
Reactions
0
Likes
AKG C636
vs
Neumann KMS 105:
59 Highlights & 39 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Choose smart with insights on what each mic offers. Ready to find your perfect match?
Trying to decide between AKG C636 and Neumann KMS 105? This microphones face-off covers tone, controls, design, and key power source, stand/tripod, warranty & cables that musicians care about.
AKG C636 vs Neumann KMS 105: A Professional Mic Duel for Stage Vocalists
When diving into the realm of handheld condenser microphones tailored for live vocal performances, the AKG C636 and Neumann KMS 105 stand out as premium options favored by professionals. Both mics deliver impressive live vocal performance capabilities, phantom power operation, and robust construction. However, the AKG C636 embraces a classic cardioid pattern optimized for versatility across live and voice recording environments with the benefit of detachable components, while the Neumann KMS 105 sharpens focus on live sound through its supercardioid pattern and proximity effect control, enhancing vocal clarity and stage isolation. These fundamental distinctions cater to different user preferences and performance needs.
A Closer Look at the AKG C636's Flexible Design and Handling
The AKG C636 earns high marks for its thoughtful design catered to the active performer. Sporting a 1-inch capsule length paired with a slender 0.9-inch capsule diameter, it achieves a crisp sound signature while maintaining a manageable size. What truly distinguishes the C636 is its detachable cable and mount system (yes), which simplifies maintenance and offers more rigging flexibility compared to fixed designs. Additionally, the inclusion of swivel/pivot capability allows users to adjust the mic angle for comfort during live sets without needing additional hardware adjustments. Its 150 dB overload point supports loud vocal dynamics without distortion, complemented by a modest 0.5% total harmonic distortion, contributing to clear, transparent sound. The ability to use an external power supply adds to the mic's versatility on complex stage setups, enabling users to tailor their power sources as necessary.
The Neumann KMS 105: Precision and Professional Broadcast Credentials
On the other hand, the Neumann KMS 105 caters to vocalists and performers who prioritize isolation and precise sound capture. Its supercardioid polar pattern is specifically designed for environments where feedback rejection is critical, helping vocals stay prominent even on busy stages. The microphone's proximity effect control feature is a game-changer for live vocalists who move close to the mic, maintaining tonal consistency and reducing the boominess that can sometimes plague close singing. Measuring a compact 7.09 inches in height with a robust 1.89-inch capsule diameter, it creates a distinctive sonic footprint. Crafted for reliability, the KMS 105 comes with a stand/tripod included, making it ready out of the box for stage use. Furthermore, it sports a coveted professional broadcast certification signaling its suitability for high-stakes broadcast audio applications; a distinction absent in the AKG model. While lacking detachable cables (No) and external power compatibility, the mic's straightforward design emphasizes simplicity and durability on stage.
Quick Take
The AKG C636 shines with its modular design, offering easy cable detachment and adjustable mount features that provide versatility during live performances and setups. Meanwhile, the Neumann KMS 105 impresses with superior vocal isolation thanks to its supercardioid pattern and proximity effect control, alongside professional broadcast certification that guarantees top-tier sound fidelity.
Bottom Line
Between the two, the Neumann KMS 105 edges ahead for live performers prioritizing precise vocal isolation with added assurance for broadcast environments and a lower price point ($670.74 at B&H Photo Video). However, if your workflow benefits from accessory flexibility, easy cable replacement, and ergonomic adjustability, the AKG C636 at $799 at Reverb stands out as an excellent choice despite the premium.
Verdict
Winner: Neumann KMS 105 - Best for vocal clarity, stage isolation, and professional broadcast use at a more accessible price.
Runner-up: AKG C636 - Ideal for users seeking modular design and adjustable mounting options plus external power adaptability.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We tested AKG C636 and Neumann KMS 105 in real-world settings. Explore how they differ in specs, user control, sound response, and studio or live use cases.
The Polar Pattern Type differs between AKG C636 and Neumann KMS 105: AKG C636 uses a Cardioid pattern while Neumann KMS 105 employs Supercardioid. This affects noise rejection and off-axis sound, making KMS 105 better for live environments requiring extra isolation.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Type on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
69
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Intermediate, Professional
vs
User Skill Level
AKG C636 is designed for Professional users, whereas Neumann KMS 105 targets both Intermediate and Professional skill levels. This suggests KMS 105 might be more approachable for users progressing in their audio proficiency.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Both AKG C636 and Neumann KMS 105 share the Handheld form factor, ensuring familiar portability and handling for users. This similarity makes either microphone suitable for on-the-go vocal performances or speaking engagements.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Form Factor on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither AKG C636 nor Neumann KMS 105 are limited edition models. This means both microphones are standard production units, potentially ensuring easier availability and comparable pricing for customers.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use?
81
AKG C636
1Votes
Live, Voice Recording
84
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Live
vs
Intended Use
The Intended Use of AKG C636 is broader, including Live and Voice Recording, while Neumann KMS 105 is focused solely on Live use. Therefore, AKG C636 offers more versatility for both stage and studio applications.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Intended Use,
AKG C636 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
This microphone is intended for live recording applications, optimized to handle live sound environments.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
68
AKG C636
0Votes
C Series
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
48
AKG C636
0Votes
Male
94
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Unisex
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
lower
46 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Target on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
98
AKG C636
0Votes
Professional
74
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Adult, Professional
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
24 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
98
AKG C636
0Votes
Global
94
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Global
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Launch Region on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
AKG C636 has a Height of 7.3 inches compared to Neumann KMS 105's 7.09 inches. The marginal 0.21 inch difference is slight, making both microphones similar in size for handheld use.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.2 inch
measurement.
Based on community votes for Height,
AKG C636 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
AKG is slightly taller than Neumann but both keep a nice handheld size suitable for performance
See more
Width
What is the width?
7.28
inch
0Votes
1.89
inch
0Votes
AKG C636
The device has a width of 7.28 inches (about 18.5 cm), which corresponds with its handheld form factor, offering a solid grip.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
5.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
4.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Package Width
The Package Width for AKG C636 is 4.5 inches, while Neumann KMS 105 does not provide this measurement. AKG's specified width may help with planning storage or transport cases, giving it a logistical edge here.
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
3.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the weight?
0.69
lbs
0Votes
0.66
lbs
0Votes
AKG C636
The microphone weighs 0.69 lbs (approximately 0.31 kg), making it lightweight and easy to handle during extended recording sessions.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
equal
0.69 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Length
What is the capsule length?
1
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Capsule Length
AKG C636 specifies a Capsule Length of 1 inch, but Neumann KMS 105 has no data. Knowledge of capsule length for AKG can influence user preference regarding pickup characteristics and directional control.
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
88
AKG C636
0Votes
5/8"
84
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
5/8"
AKG C636
The microphone accepts a standard 5/8" mounting thread, compatible with most microphone stands and boom arms.
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
In the battle of Mounting Thread Size,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter
What is the capsule diameter?
0.9
inch
0Votes
1.89
inch
1Votes
vs
Capsule Diameter
The Capsule Diameter of AKG C636 is 0.9 inches, much smaller than Neumann KMS 105's 1.89 inches. A larger capsule diameter in KMS 105 can provide richer sound capture, favoring it for nuanced vocal performance.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
In the battle of Capsule Diameter,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 inch
measurement.
Based on community votes for Capsule Diameter,
AKG C636 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Neumann's capsule diameter is almost double which likely contributes to its rich sound compared to AKG's smaller size
See more
Depth
What is the depth?
1.9
inch
0Votes
7.08
inch
0Votes
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
lower
5.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
10.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Package Depth
AKG C636 offers a Package Depth of 10.5 inches, whereas Neumann KMS 105 lacks this data. This precise packaging info from AKG can simplify travel and shipping decisions compared to Neumann.
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
2.01
inch
0Votes
1.89
inch
0Votes
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
In the battle of Grill Diameter,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control is absent in AKG C636 but enabled in Neumann KMS 105. This feature helps KMS 105 users manage bass boost when close to the mic, improving vocal clarity in live settings.
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Based on community votes for Proximity Effect Control,
AKG C636 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Both AKG C636 and Neumann KMS 105 have an identical Overload Point of 150 dB. This high threshold suits both microphones for loud sound sources, making them reliable choices for dynamic live performances.
The SPL level where overload occurs.
In the battle of Overload Point,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
equal
150.00 dB
measurement.
Based on community votes for Overload Point,
AKG C636 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Both mics handle loud vocals well with the same 150 dB overload point so volume won't be an issue
See more
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
What is the SNR?
74
dB
0Votes
76
dB
0Votes
AKG C636
Signal-to-noise ratio is 74 dB, indicating a good separation between the audio signal and background noise.
Neumann KMS 105
The Neumann KMS 105 features an impressive A-weighted signal-to-noise ratio of 76 dB (relative to 94 dB SPL) and a CCIR-weighted ratio of 66 dB. The A-weighted measurement is crucial for assessing microphone self-noise, showcasing its exceptional audio quality.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
In the battle of Signal-to-Noise Ratio,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Max SPL
What is the maximum SPL?
150
dB
0Votes
150
dB
0Votes
AKG C636
The maximum sound pressure level (SPL) is 150 dB, allowing this microphone to handle very loud sources without distortion.
Neumann KMS 105
Handles sound pressure levels as high as 150 dB without distortion, perfect for high-volume environments like concerts.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
equal
150.00 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max SPL on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Impedance
What is the output impedance?
200
ohm
0Votes
50
ohm
0Votes
AKG C636
The output impedance is 200 ohms, a typical value for professional microphones, ensuring compatibility with various preamps and interfaces.
Neumann KMS 105
Standard for professional microphones, ensuring proper impedance matching with audio equipment.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
In the battle of Output Impedance,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
150.0 ohm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
80
Hz
0Votes
120
Hz
0Votes
AKG C636
A low-cut filter is set at 80 Hz, helping to reduce unwanted low-frequency rumble and handling noise.
Neumann KMS 105
The 120 Hz low-cut filter is designed to eliminate unwanted low-frequency noise, such as handling noise or wind.
Removes low-end rumble.
In the battle of Low-Cut Filter,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
lower
40.0 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
Yes
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
AKG C636
Voice isolation features help minimize background noise, providing clearer voice capture in mixed sound environments.
Neumann KMS 105
Helps isolate the voice from surrounding noise, ideal for live performance and broadcast situations.
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
98
AKG C636
0Votes
Transformerless
94
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Transformerless
AKG C636
The microphone uses a transformerless design, typically resulting in a cleaner sound with improved transient response.
Neumann KMS 105
A transformerless design reduces weight and the chance of introducing noise into the signal.
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
98
AKG C636
0Votes
Condenser
94
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Condenser
AKG C636
It is a condenser microphone, known for sensitivity and accuracy in capturing detailed audio.
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
20,000
Hz
0Votes
20,000
Hz
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
With a frequency range that extends up to 20 kHz, this mic captures a wide range of frequencies, ideal for detailed vocal performances.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
equal
20,000.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-33
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-38
dBV/Pa
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
A sensitivity of -38 dBV/Pa indicates it captures even subtle sounds, suitable for accurate and crisp audio.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
5.0 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
135
dB
0Votes
132
dB
0Votes
AKG C636
The dynamic range of 135 dB allows recording both very quiet and very loud sounds without loss of detail.
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
In the battle of Dynamic Range,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
3.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
2,000
Ω
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Minimum Terminating Impedance
AKG C636 lists a Minimum Terminating Impedance of 2000 Ω, while Neumann KMS 105 does not specify this value. AKG’s specification assists in matching with preamps, giving technical users an advantage.
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Noise Level
What is the equivalent noise level?
20
dB
0Votes
18
dB
0Votes
AKG C636
Equivalent noise level is low at 20 dB, implying quiet operation and minimal self-noise during quiet recordings.
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
In the battle of Equivalent Noise Level,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
2.0 dB
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Noise Level on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
0.5
%
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
THD
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) for AKG C636 is 0.5%, whereas Neumann KMS 105 does not provide this data. AKG’s low THD rate indicates clear sound reproduction, possibly favoring audiophiles and recording pros.
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
68
AKG C636
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
64
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
AKG C636
The microphone uses the Pressure Gradient acoustic principle, which means it responds to differences in pressure between two sides of the diaphragm. This principle is common for directional microphones, providing better rejection of sounds from unwanted directions.
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
In the battle of Acoustic Principle,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
15
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
AKG C636
This microphone offers a headroom of 15 dB, which helps it handle sudden loud sounds without distortion, ensuring a clean recording.
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headroom on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
98
AKG C636
0Votes
Fast
94
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Fast
AKG C636
Transient response is fast, allowing the microphone to accurately capture quick changes in sound, important for detailed audio.
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
In the battle of Transient Response,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
68
AKG C636
0Votes
Stepped
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
AKG C636
Polar pattern switching is stepped, meaning the user can select from predefined directional modes rather than continuous adjustment.
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Preamp Quality
What is the internal preamp quality?
77
AKG C636
0Votes
Studio-Grade
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
AKG C636
The internal preamp is studio-grade, promising high-quality amplification with low noise and distortion suitable for professional recordings.
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
73
AKG C636
0Votes
Small Diaphragm
69
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Small Diaphragm
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
In the battle of Capsule Type,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
20
Hz
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Min) on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Directionality
What is the directionality?
48
AKG C636
0Votes
Cardioid
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
General pickup orientation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Range
What is the gain range?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The adjustable gain span.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Range on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
18
AKG C636
0Votes
Mono
14
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Mono
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
20
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
-45
dBV/Pa
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
AKG C636 has a detachable cable which is super handy on stage for quick fixes while Neumann just doesn't have that
See more
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
43
AKG C636
0Votes
Analog, Balanced
44
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Balanced
AKG C636
Audio output options include analog balanced signals, which minimize noise and interference in audio transmission.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
Yes
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
AKG C636
The microphone supports phantom power, essential for powering condenser capsules and onboard electronics.
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
98
AKG C636
0Votes
Balanced
94
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Balanced
AKG C636
Audio output is balanced, reducing noise and allowing longer cable runs without signal degradation.
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Shielding Against RF Interference
Is there RF shielding?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
AKG C636
The microphone is shielded against RF interference, improving signal integrity in environments with high radio frequency noise.
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Connection Interface
What is the connection interface?
38
AKG C636
0Votes
XLR
34
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
XLR
vs
Connection Interface
Both AKG C636 and Neumann KMS 105 utilize XLR Connection Interfaces. This professional standard ensures compatibility with most mixing consoles and audio interfaces, providing users with robust connectivity.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Interface on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Technology
What wireless technology is used?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
28
AKG C636
0Votes
Standard
24
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Standard
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source for both AKG C636 and Neumann KMS 105 is Phantom power, a standard for professional microphones providing stable and clean audio signal integrity.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither AKG C636 nor Neumann KMS 105 feature Power Indicator Lights. This omission suggests users must rely on external equipment indicators to confirm microphone power status.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
48
Volt
0Votes
48
Volt
0Votes
AKG C636
Phantom power requirement is 48 Volts, which is industry standard for condenser microphones, enabling it to be powered by most professional audio interfaces and mixers.
Neumann KMS 105
Works with the standard 48V phantom power, ensuring compatibility with most professional audio equipment.
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
In the battle of Phantom Power Requirement,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
equal
48.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
External Power Supply Compatibility
Is it compatible with an external power supply?
Yes
1Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
vs
External Power Supply Compatibility
AKG C636 is compatible with External Power Supplies, while Neumann KMS 105 is not. This makes AKG more versatile for various phantom power sourcing scenarios during complex setups.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for External Power Supply Compatibility,
AKG C636 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
AKG supports external power supply compatibility offering more flexibility on stage unlike Neumann
See more
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control is not included in either AKG C636 or Neumann KMS 105. Users must rely on mixing consoles or personal monitors for mix adjustments.
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither AKG C636 nor Neumann KMS 105 include LED Indicator Lights, limiting visual feedback for power or status, which may require users to check other devices to confirm readiness.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
App or Software Integration is not available in either AKG C636 or Neumann KMS 105, indicating these microphones focus on straightforward hardware operation without digital control interfaces.
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Onboard Controls
What onboard controls are available?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Types of direct physical controls.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
On/Off Switch on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Mute Function
Does it have a mute function?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
vs
Mute Function
The Mute Function is absent in both AKG C636 and Neumann KMS 105, so muting must be managed externally. Users needing on-mic muting might need additional equipment.
Ability to mute audio directly on the mic.
In the battle of Mute Function,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mute Function on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Control on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Headphone Monitoring
Does it support headphone monitoring?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EQ Presets on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
Yes
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lock Mode on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Arm/Stand on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Pop Filter
Is a pop filter included?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
Yes
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
AKG C636
It includes a pop filter, which reduces plosive sounds from speech, resulting in smoother vocal recordings.
Neumann KMS 105
The included pop filter minimizes plosives, ensuring cleaner vocal recordings, especially when speaking or singing close to the mic.
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pop Filter on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Windscreen
Is a windscreen included?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
Yes
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
AKG C636
This model includes a windscreen, which helps reduce wind noise and plosives when recording in challenging environments.
Neumann KMS 105
A standard accessory to reduce wind noise, particularly useful in outdoor environments.
Whether a windscreen is included for wind noise control.
In the battle of Windscreen,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Windscreen on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Body Material
What is the body material?
53
AKG C636
0Votes
Zinc
44
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Metal
AKG C636
The body material is zinc, offering durability and a premium feel for professional use.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Body Material on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
38
AKG C636
0Votes
Matte
34
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Matte
AKG C636
The finish is matte, which reduces reflections and enhances the microphone's aesthetic in studio and stage environments.
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish/Coating on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Shock Mount
Is a shock mount included?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
Yes
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Neumann KMS 105
Helps reduce vibrations and handling noise, improving audio quality during use.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Mount on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Mount
Is the mount detachable?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
AKG C636
This microphone includes a detachable mount, allowing easy attachment or removal from stands or clips for transport or setup.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Mount on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
0
°F
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
AKG C636
No heat resistance rating is specified (0 °F), suggesting normal operating temperature range without high heat tolerance.
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resistance on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dust Resistance on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Design on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Material
What is the grill material?
58
AKG C636
0Votes
Metal
74
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
Steel
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
lower
16 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Material on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Dampening Material
What is the internal dampening material?
78
AKG C636
0Votes
Foam
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance
Is it corrosion resistant?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Neodymium Magnet on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
13
Neumann KMS 105
0Votes
32° to 104°F
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
Yes
0Votes
AKG C636
Yes
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
AKG C636
The microphone has FCC and CE approvals, ensuring adherence to key regulatory standards for safety and electromagnetic compatibility.
Neumann KMS 105
Approved for use in regions with strict electronic standards, ensuring the microphone meets regulatory requirements.
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval,
AKG C636 ◉ is
better than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FCC/CE Approval on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Professional Broadcast Certification
Is it broadcast certified?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
Yes
1Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Neumann KMS 105
Certified for professional broadcast use, making it a reliable choice for studio and live broadcast environments.
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Based on community votes for Professional Broadcast Certification,
AKG C636 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
DSP Processing on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Tracking
Does it include voice tracking?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Automatically follows speaker’s voice.
In the battle of Voice Tracking,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Tracking on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows?
0Votes
AKG C636
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
Yes
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Ability to update functionality via firmware.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
AKG C636 ◉ is
worse than
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-Compensating Coil
Does it have a hum-compensating coil?
No
0Votes
AKG C636
No
0Votes
Neumann KMS 105
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
AKG C636 ◉ is
same as
Neumann KMS 105 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on AKG C636 ◉
vs Neumann KMS 105 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
18
